| Author |
Message |
xinxin
Joined: 08 Oct 2003 Posts: 217
|
04 Dec 2003 2:04 Why choice a envelope modulation in the GSM phone? |
|
|
|
| Why choice a envelope modulation in the GSM phone?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pewang
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 139 Helped: 1 Location: China PRC
|
04 Dec 2003 2:14 |
|
|
|
| Maybe for high efficiency spectrum witdth usage.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flatulent
Joined: 19 Jul 2002 Posts: 4856 Helped: 292 Location: Middle Earth
|
04 Dec 2003 2:59 Re: Why choice a envelope modulation in the GSM phone? |
|
|
|
| Constant envelope signals can go through class C amplifiers. Nonconstant types have to go through class B with a lot of backoff to keep the out of channel power down. There is a big difference in DC power input between these two methods for the same RF output power.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xinxin
Joined: 08 Oct 2003 Posts: 217
|
04 Dec 2003 5:10 |
|
|
|
| Flatulent , Could you make a statement in detail for me ? Thanks!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flatulent
Joined: 19 Jul 2002 Posts: 4856 Helped: 292 Location: Middle Earth
|
04 Dec 2003 6:58 do the math |
|
|
|
You can do the math to get a better understanding. The generalized signal can be described as
A(t) cos ( f(t) t + angle(t))
That is the amplitude, frequency, and phase are functions of time.
Approximate the amplifier as a polynomial a1 v(t) + a2 (v(t))^2 and so on. Make three signals by making just one of the variables in the first equation a variable and the rest constants. Put them individually through the polynomial. What you get out is the revealing thing.
When A(t) is a constant you get out just harmonics of f(t) which can be filtered. When A(t) is a variable you get extra sidebands on the carrier.
As far as real world amplifiers go, if the signal level is lower the a2 (v(t))^2 and higher terms are lower.
Since the DC power into an amplifier is voltage times current, swinging the output much less than the power supply level is inefficient.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |