| Author |
Message |
amarnath
Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Posts: 939 Helped: 18
|
27 Feb 2004 18:59 |
|
|
|
|
| i think ultimately system c will win the race...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blacklancer
Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 7
|
09 Mar 2004 16:19 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
I think systemverilog is better,but it need some days to popularize.
specman need support of EDA tool vendor.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bajaj
Joined: 19 Aug 2001 Posts: 31
|
09 Mar 2004 19:49 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| combination of system c and system verilog
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bagane
Joined: 12 Mar 2004 Posts: 7
|
12 Mar 2004 7:04 |
|
|
|
|
| I think SystemC is better
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lemon
Joined: 11 Mar 2004 Posts: 2
|
12 Mar 2004 14:59 |
|
|
|
|
| I also prefer to system verilog
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bbtjacking
Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 27
|
13 Mar 2004 6:11 |
|
|
|
|
| As well as I know,SystemC is best for system level and RTL verificaion. And some company, such as Cadence and Synopsys will be focus on this field. For instance, in order to make systemc better for verification, Cadence extend the systemc into CVE according to join some Randomization and concurrency verification methodology and functions into systemc library.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
13 Mar 2004 6:11 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
u571
Joined: 14 Mar 2004 Posts: 0
|
14 Mar 2004 16:29 |
|
|
|
|
| I think systemC is better, for good interface with C++/C.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
omara007
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 1283 Helped: 39 Location: Dubai
|
07 Apr 2004 20:24 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
anyone can direct me to where i can download any e-book for systemC ?
I have heard that there is a good one called (System Design with SystemC) .. is it available here on servers ? .. or even anywhere on the internet ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ramesh
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 1260 Helped: 5
|
13 Jun 2004 16:39 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| edacw wrote: |
| SystemVerilog is very good! |
Please give reasons whenever you say "it is very good" when compared with others. Otherwise the post may be classified as "useless post" by Moderators!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reddy
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Posts: 19 Location: Bangalore, India
|
22 Jun 2004 5:25 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
VERA is Better in my opinion. Because, it is having all the OOP features. Moreover I did not use others.
So, no comment on other lang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
foster_cn
Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 74 Helped: 2
|
23 Jun 2004 7:08 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| Any of them, depends on the projects
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zwj_seu
Joined: 12 Jun 2004 Posts: 43
|
25 Jun 2004 4:45 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| I'm using specman now.It maybe hard to learn at the beginning,but it's powerful !
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zhangpengyu
Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 177 Helped: 2
|
28 Jun 2004 12:24 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| Specman is best!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ram
Joined: 03 May 2004 Posts: 118 Helped: 4
|
16 Jul 2004 10:42 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
Now a days many companies are prefering systemc over e....
The reason is simple...the clint which they are going to suplly may not have specman licence...and systemc is free
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yerics
Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 40 Location: Beijing,China
|
26 Jul 2004 8:24 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
Just as ram said , specman is too expensive , but it is a very great tool.
our boss decide to not purchase specman license any longer next year.
HHH
we will have to use other ...to do verification work
may be systemC
| ram wrote: |
Now a days many companies are prefering systemc over e....
The reason is simple...the clint which they are going to suplly may not have specman licence...and systemc is free |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mami_hacky
Joined: 28 Mar 2002 Posts: 724 Helped: 4 Location: Some where
|
01 Aug 2004 17:05 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
Umm, I studied all of the messages here. the result, I think is to use SystemC and SystemVerilog. and to leave e, and vera. Yes?
SystemC is now supported by both of synopsys and cadence, however, no other languge here has such a propery.
correct?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seasonyangd
Joined: 14 Nov 2001 Posts: 80
|
02 Aug 2004 4:34 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| If you have experience with c/c++ programming. I suggest you SystemC. You can use it fluently. Cadence Incisive had integerated teh GDB into their debug env (I have not test it). Also, you can use TXE to analyse the data base and do function coverage analysis.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sansprint
Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 22
|
01 Sep 2005 10:02 hello ,can i ask you some question about openvera? |
|
|
|
|
hi,Can you tell me something about it ?I had studied it for a month,but i really don't know how to write a programe,can you tell how to write ?Thank you very much!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
omara007
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 1283 Helped: 39 Location: Dubai
|
01 Sep 2005 10:44 Re: hello ,can i ask you some question about openvera? |
|
|
|
|
| sansprint wrote: |
hi,Can you tell me something about it ?I had studied it for a month,but i really don't know how to write a programe,can you tell how to write ?Thank you very much! |
try a simple program .. chose a very simple one .. like a module with one input port and one output port .. chosen any style in the literature for coding .. and make one process .. let it be sc_method for example .. and in the cpp file write one statement .. cout << " Hi" ..
then if it works .. try to append something .. make some cin's .. try some if condition statements ... then upgrade urself to sc_thread .. try waits ..
u can also go to www.systemc.org and just listen to the discussions ..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rakeshnunna
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 80 Helped: 6
|
01 Sep 2005 15:59 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| In my opinion System Verilog is the most promising
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nanako
Joined: 20 Jul 2001 Posts: 119
|
01 Sep 2005 16:04 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| systemverilog does look promising as if you look at the LRM, basically it could do almost everything under the sun but the current support by the EDA vendor on their simulator with systemverilog is still far from what the standard is capable of doing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjww110
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 262 Helped: 5 Location: china
|
02 Sep 2005 10:27 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| systemverilog will win in the future!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sansprint
Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 22
|
02 Sep 2005 14:46 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| omara007,thank you for you tell me so much !Because my english is so bad ,so i don't konw how to express my question,i'm so sorry!:|but can anyone give me an example: a verifiction program write by openvera?a very simple one .thank you very much !
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cnspy
Joined: 10 Sep 2002 Posts: 155 Helped: 3
|
06 Sep 2005 8:26 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| Cadence does not support systemverilog very well. I am testing the assertion of SV. But ncsim does not support such as: not and clock edge between sequence .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dqsh06
Joined: 02 Apr 2005 Posts: 3 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
06 Sep 2005 8:52 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
It is a very old topic, i think. now Cadence has perchased verisity. so E language (specman) can be a good choice for verification. Systemc is not a verification language, it is for system modeling.
Vera, PSL are all verification language.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zcg
Joined: 19 May 2004 Posts: 19
|
06 Sep 2005 10:37 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| old_cat wrote: |
I think specman 'e' is good!
First, it's a mature verification language and excellent support from verisity. Maybe, verisity is only a little-boy so they have to do good support.
Second, it's a aspect-oriented language, easy to use and you can extend new funcionalities easily.
Anyway, who likes to be verification engineer? It's hard to find a job as a verification engineer in the north american. It is better to be ASIC designer rather than verification engineer.
 |
First ,specman E is good but not generally supported by other EDA company. System C and system verilog maybe have more bright future to be common standard.
Second, I think you have a wrong idea of verification job. In fact a good verification engineer should have more knowledge than RTL engineer. Many of them are tranfered from skilled design engineers.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soccer
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 176 Helped: 2
|
07 Sep 2005 8:18 SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
vera is too hard to learn.
e is most popular
systemverilog is most hopeful
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nittinsharma80
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 99 Helped: 7 Location: INDIA
|
07 Sep 2005 13:27 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| SystemVerilog is the FUTURE
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
omara007
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 1283 Helped: 39 Location: Dubai
|
07 Sep 2005 14:01 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| nittinsharma80 wrote: |
| SystemVerilog is the FUTURE |
I guess SystemVerilog is suffering the same problem that Verilog suffers .. being slow .. compared to C .. or specifically SystemC ..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nittinsharma80
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 99 Helped: 7 Location: INDIA
|
08 Sep 2005 8:45 Re: SystemC , Systemverilog , vera , specman... |
|
|
|
|
| But it has more powerfull features than SystemC and is being used more in the industry
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |