Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

Noise Figure?

 
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> RF, Microwave, Antennas and Optics
Author Message
dd2001



Joined: 14 Apr 2002
Posts: 282


Post16 Mar 2003 2:12   Noise Figure?

NF of Lossy network, ie. filter, passive mixer, is equal to the loss of the network in DB, what is this physical meaning?

That is bad or good?
Back to top
BigBoss



Joined: 17 Nov 2001
Posts: 928
Helped: 47


Post16 Mar 2003 2:21   

This is generally unwanted thing. But to escape from that is opposite of the nature of the material.

If you use a passive circuit at the input of a receiver system , NF will impact directly to NF of system .

In fact , it really depends on many factor , bandwith , gain etc ( remember Friis formula ). Sometimes they should be used with amount of attenuation , sometimes they don't create great impact system performance.

Your question is very general , please be specific.
Back to top
dd2001



Joined: 14 Apr 2002
Posts: 282


Post16 Mar 2003 3:12   again?

Thanks.

My question is: Why NF = loss of passive filter (in dB)?

that is if my LPF loss is 3dB, then NF of LPS is 3dB! What is meaning of this?
Back to top
flatulent



Joined: 19 Jul 2002
Posts: 4856
Helped: 292
Location: Middle Earth


Post16 Mar 2003 4:13   definition of noise figure

The definition of noise figure is the input signal to noise ratio compared to the output signal to noise ratio.

All eletrical circuit components have a noise output power of at least kTB where k is Boltzman's constant, T is absolute temperature and B is the cyclic bandwidth (Hz).

The noise out of a resistive attenuator is kTB with nothing connected to the input. The signal comes in with kTB of noise from its source. After going through the 3 dB attenuator there is 3 dB less signal and the old kTB of noise.

Thus the signal to noise ratlio has been reduced by 3 dB and by the definition of noise figure, the NF is 3 dB.
Back to top
marcomdd



Joined: 11 Jan 2003
Posts: 158
Helped: 3
Location: Rome


Post17 Mar 2003 7:50   

Pay attention: for a mixer, even passive, this is non true !
Back to top
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> RF, Microwave, Antennas and Optics
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour


Abuse
Administrator
Moderators
topic RSS 
sitemap