| Author |
Message |
Breeza
Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Posts: 8
|
 27 Feb 2003 6:01 Qu(at)rtus II 2.2 fail during installation process |
|
|
|
| Error 0x80004005. Op. system WinXP Pro Eng. SP1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phytex
Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 176
|
| 27 Feb 2003 9:34 Sorry |
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but when you get this error message, I think you qu(at)rtus Version have a corrupt file! At work we have the same Problem, then @ltera changed the disk and it works!!
Phytex
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Breeza
Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Posts: 8
|
| 28 Feb 2003 3:02 NO! On other machine this installation works fine! |
|
|
|
| Phytex wrote: |
I'm sorry, but when you get this error message, I think you qu(at)rtus Version have a corrupt file! At work we have the same Problem, then @ltera changed the disk and it works!!
Phytex |
NO!!! On other machine installation was successful! And then i copy folder
"qu(at)rtus" on the "corrupted machine", Qu(at)rtus work fine!
Sorry, my english is bad  (
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
winworm
Joined: 25 Apr 2001
Posts: 356
|
| 28 Feb 2003 9:00 |
|
|
|
| qu(at)rtus II 2.2 is buggy.Simulation is wrong.So if it give a wrong output,please install SP1.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mami_hacky
Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Posts: 683
Helped: 4
Location: Some where
|
| 28 Feb 2003 10:26 |
|
|
|
| Any idea about the speed of qu(at)rtus II 2.2 when running on Windows compared with Linux?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cyu021
Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 2
|
| 14 Jul 2003 10:01 |
|
|
|
I personally recommand you to try ModelSim, use qu(at)rtus II only when you are 200% sure about the design is flawless and when you are going to download your into an @ltera device.
Compared to Quartus2, ModelSim takes only about 1/10 to 1/20 of time to complie and simulate a design in Windows. However, I believe same applies to Linux.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
