electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

Miller OTA Design - questions about Miller methodology


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Analog IC Design & Layout -> Miller OTA Design - questions about Miller methodology
Author Message
dtzounakos



Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 36


Post05 Nov 2009 10:14   

Miller OTA Design


I uploaded af paper about Miller OTA based Gm/IDS Methdology!It's short and simple.

I understood everything except the concept of finding the Early Voltage VA3,VA4

through equation 1! From design specifications we know the overall gain Av(dB)> 80,

not Av1. How do we know and calculate Av1 dc gain? I would appreciate if someone

could spend a few minutes and answer my question!

Thanks!!



Sorry, but you need login in to view this attachment

Back to top
erikl



Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 735
Helped: 138
Location: Germany


Post06 Nov 2009 14:05   

Re: Miller OTA Design


dtzounakos wrote:
... I understood everything except the concept of finding the Early Voltage VA3,VA4 through equation 1!
From design specifications we know the overall gain Av(dB)> 80, not Av1.
How do we know and calculate Av1 dc gain?

I think the statement

"considering the DC gain spec, L1 and VA1, the current mirror VA3 can be obtained through equation 1 → VA3 = VA4 = 10.2;"

is wrong: Like VA1 = VA2 (s. item above the a.m. statement), VA3 = VA4 = 10.2 is obtained from the gm/Id vs. VA curves (with L as parameter, s. item below the a.m. statement), not through equation 1 . Then, with all values introduced into this equation, Av1 can be calculated (Av1 ≈ 100 = 40dB), then similarily Av2 .

It's not the only error in this paper: M1-M2 is a PMOS differential pair, not an NMOS (p. 3), and L(M8 ) = 1 and not 1.5µm (p. 4).

HTH! erikl
Back to top
dtzounakos



Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 36


Post06 Nov 2009 15:33   

Re: Miller OTA Design


Thanks for interesting to this paper.
But i still can't uderstand how calculates VA3,VA4 without prior knowing the right

value of L3=L4! At first statement, we choose L1=L2=3um and we find value

VA1 and VA2 through plot VA=f(Gm/IDS)! At second statement, we don't know L3,L4

and VA3,VA4.In order to estimate one value of these variables, we must prior know

the other value!

Unless if we prior choose (arbitrary) Av1=40dB!
Back to top
erikl



Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 735
Helped: 138
Location: Germany


Post06 Nov 2009 17:19   

Re: Miller OTA Design


dtzounakos wrote:
... i still can't uderstand how calculates VA3,VA4 ...

No, it's not calculated, it's obtained from the gm/Id vs. VA curves (with L as parameter), s. my previous posting.

dtzounakos wrote:
... without prior knowing the right value of L3=L4!

gm/Id is already known. In the gm/Id vs. VA family of curves (L is the family parameter) a parallel line to the x-axis is drawn with the known ordinate value gm/Id. It meets the array of curves at several points which mean L-VA pairs. Now you can choose a convenient L-VA combination, e.g. 0.6µm - 10.2V for M3-M4 in this case, which will achieve a reasonable Av1 .

dtzounakos wrote:
At first statement, we choose L1=L2=3um and we find value VA1 and VA2 through plot VA=f(Gm/IDS)!

Yes; same method as mentioned above. The L-value is governed by considering the required GBW, as well as by noise & matching (means: offset) requirements. The chosen relatively high L=3µm value achieves an appropriately high VA1=VA2 value.

dtzounakos wrote:
At second statement, we don't know L3,L4 and VA3,VA4.
In order to estimate one value of these variables, we must prior know the other value!

That's true, but you can always choose between several L-VA pairs, s. above. Higher L-VA pair values result in larger gain & GBW, however need more real estate area.

dtzounakos wrote:
Unless if we prior choose (arbitrary) Av1=40dB!

That's another possibility. In this case, the VA value can be calculated, and the point of intersection between its value and the known Gm/IDS value on the VA=f(Gm/IDS) array of curves gives the L value.
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post06 Nov 2009 17:19   

Ads




Back to top
dtzounakos



Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 36


Post07 Nov 2009 1:12   

Re: Miller OTA Design


Thanks for reply. I understood the concept!
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Analog IC Design & Layout -> Miller OTA Design - questions about Miller methodology
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
Help_Fully Differential Miller Ota _Closed Loop DC Sweep (3)
why miller compenstation not required in folded cascode OTA? (1)
Few questions concerning the Miller Op amp (5)
About miller effect (16)
question about conjugate complex poles in miller opamp (3)
A question about miller compensation and strage zero (2)
help needed about miller effect and feedback theory (4)
Why we need to reduce miller effect in LNA design? (5)
Some questions about an OTA design. (1)
Questions about bulk driven OTA design (5)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS