| Author |
Message |
dtzounakos
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
|
05 Nov 2009 10:14 Miller OTA Design |
|
|
|
|
I uploaded af paper about Miller OTA based Gm/IDS Methdology!It's short and simple.
I understood everything except the concept of finding the Early Voltage VA3,VA4
through equation 1! From design specifications we know the overall gain Av(dB)> 80,
not Av1. How do we know and calculate Av1 dc gain? I would appreciate if someone
could spend a few minutes and answer my question!
Thanks!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erikl
Joined: 09 Sep 2008 Posts: 735 Helped: 138 Location: Germany
|
06 Nov 2009 14:05 Re: Miller OTA Design |
|
|
|
|
| dtzounakos wrote: |
... I understood everything except the concept of finding the Early Voltage VA3,VA4 through equation 1!
From design specifications we know the overall gain Av(dB)> 80, not Av1.
How do we know and calculate Av1 dc gain? |
I think the statement
"considering the DC gain spec, L1 and VA1, the current mirror VA3 can be obtained through equation 1 → VA3 = VA4 = 10.2;"
is wrong: Like VA1 = VA2 (s. item above the a.m. statement), VA3 = VA4 = 10.2 is obtained from the gm/Id vs. VA curves (with L as parameter, s. item below the a.m. statement), not through equation 1 . Then, with all values introduced into this equation, Av1 can be calculated (Av1 ≈ 100 = 40dB), then similarily Av2 .
It's not the only error in this paper: M1-M2 is a PMOS differential pair, not an NMOS (p. 3), and L(M8 ) = 1 and not 1.5µm (p. 4).
HTH! erikl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dtzounakos
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
|
06 Nov 2009 15:33 Re: Miller OTA Design |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for interesting to this paper.
But i still can't uderstand how calculates VA3,VA4 without prior knowing the right
value of L3=L4! At first statement, we choose L1=L2=3um and we find value
VA1 and VA2 through plot VA=f(Gm/IDS)! At second statement, we don't know L3,L4
and VA3,VA4.In order to estimate one value of these variables, we must prior know
the other value!
Unless if we prior choose (arbitrary) Av1=40dB!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erikl
Joined: 09 Sep 2008 Posts: 735 Helped: 138 Location: Germany
|
06 Nov 2009 17:19 Re: Miller OTA Design |
|
|
|
|
| dtzounakos wrote: |
| ... i still can't uderstand how calculates VA3,VA4 ... |
No, it's not calculated, it's obtained from the gm/Id vs. VA curves (with L as parameter), s. my previous posting.
| dtzounakos wrote: |
| ... without prior knowing the right value of L3=L4! |
gm/Id is already known. In the gm/Id vs. VA family of curves (L is the family parameter) a parallel line to the x-axis is drawn with the known ordinate value gm/Id. It meets the array of curves at several points which mean L-VA pairs. Now you can choose a convenient L-VA combination, e.g. 0.6µm - 10.2V for M3-M4 in this case, which will achieve a reasonable Av1 .
| dtzounakos wrote: |
| At first statement, we choose L1=L2=3um and we find value VA1 and VA2 through plot VA=f(Gm/IDS)! |
Yes; same method as mentioned above. The L-value is governed by considering the required GBW, as well as by noise & matching (means: offset) requirements. The chosen relatively high L=3µm value achieves an appropriately high VA1=VA2 value.
| dtzounakos wrote: |
At second statement, we don't know L3,L4 and VA3,VA4.
In order to estimate one value of these variables, we must prior know the other value! |
That's true, but you can always choose between several L-VA pairs, s. above. Higher L-VA pair values result in larger gain & GBW, however need more real estate area.
| dtzounakos wrote: |
| Unless if we prior choose (arbitrary) Av1=40dB! |
That's another possibility. In this case, the VA value can be calculated, and the point of intersection between its value and the known Gm/IDS value on the VA=f(Gm/IDS) array of curves gives the L value.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
06 Nov 2009 17:19 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dtzounakos
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
|
07 Nov 2009 1:12 Re: Miller OTA Design |
|
|
|
|
| Thanks for reply. I understood the concept!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |