electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

Does they really need to be same frequency to compare phase?


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Hobby Circuits and Small Projects Problems -> Does they really need to be same frequency to compare phase?
Author Message
cherishnguyen



Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Location: Korea


Post02 Nov 2009 5:23   

Does they really need to be same frequency to compare phase?


Hi all,

Can anyone please explain to me that is it possible to compare phase difference b/t 2 signals which are at different freq, or we firstly have to convert them into the same freq and then compare their phase together?

Thx in advance.
Back to top
zorro



Joined: 06 Sep 2001
Posts: 380
Helped: 47


Post02 Nov 2009 13:11   

Re: Does they really need to be same frequency to compare ph


Hi cherishnguyen,

the phase difference between two sinusoids (or complex exponentials) of different frequency is
Δθ = θo + Δω×t
It increases in time without bound.
Normally, phase difference is defined and measured for signals of the same frequency.
One (or both) of the signals can be modulated in phase. In that case the phase difference is time-varying, but bounded if the carrier frequency is the same
Regards

Z
Back to top
cherishnguyen



Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Location: Korea


Post03 Nov 2009 2:33   

Re: Does they really need to be same frequency to compare ph


zorro wrote:
Hi cherishnguyen,

the phase difference between two sinusoids (or complex exponentials) of different frequency is
Δθ = θo + Δω×t
It increases in time without bound.
Normally, phase difference is defined and measured for signals of the same frequency.
One (or both) of the signals can be modulated in phase. In that case the phase difference is time-varying, but bounded if the carrier frequency is the same
Regards

Z


Thanks for your help. I agree with you that "Normally, phase difference is defined and measured for signals of the same frequency". Just one thing i still confused when there are 2 signals, for ex. 2 sinusoids A and B, where freq of B is twice freq of A.
How are they considered as in-phase, is it because they are started at the same initial time t=0 (same θo), even at another time t≠0, their phase are different (because their ω are not the same)? I drew them on paper but cannot explain, maybe i misunderstand something. I really need your advise to make clear these stuff.

Thx very much.
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post03 Nov 2009 2:33   

Ads




Back to top
betwixt



Joined: 04 Jul 2009
Posts: 386
Helped: 64
Location: Wales, UK


Post03 Nov 2009 9:57   

Re: Does they really need to be same frequency to compare ph


That is a good question Cherishnguyen.

Perhaps we should redefine 'in-phase' as meaning the same point in the two waveforms align with each other at fixed intervals. That interval being a multiple of the cycle lengths.

If we only consider signals of the same frequency it implies that PLL frequency multiplying is not possible!

Brian.
Back to top
zorro



Joined: 06 Sep 2001
Posts: 380
Helped: 47


Post03 Nov 2009 20:39   

Re: Does they really need to be same frequency to compare ph


Hi,

The concept of "to be in phase" between two signals is defined when they are sinusoids of the same frequency.
For other signals, we can speak about "instantaneous phase" between them. For example, the instantaneous phase between a carrier and a phase-mudulated signal (with the same carrier) follows variations according to the modulating signal.
The concept can be extended to any two signals. Consider the phasors representing them: The angle between them is the instantaneous phase between them. Occasionally their phase difference is zero, but we can not say that they are "signals in phase".

cherishnguyen wrote:
Just one thing i still confused when there are 2 signals, for ex. 2 sinusoids A and B, where freq of B is twice freq of A.


In that case, one phasor is rotating at twice the speed of the other.
We could adopt a convention: say they are in phase if they coincide when they are on the real axis (i.e., if they pass by their maximum at the same time). But this would be just a convention.

betwixt wrote:
If we only consider signals of the same frequency it implies that PLL frequency multiplying is not possible!


I don't agree. The two signals entering the phase comparator must have the same frequency with fluctuations in their instantaneous phase. But if the frequencies are "substantially" different, the PLL is not locked.
It is possible that in a PLL the two frequencies are harmonically related (harmonic lock), but in that case they have a common harmonic, and the phase comparator compares the phase between those components (same frequency).

Regards

Z
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Hobby Circuits and Small Projects Problems -> Does they really need to be same frequency to compare phase?
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
LED Drivers - what are they, really? (16)
Do they really implement a partial response for digital mod (1)
filtercircuit and integrator(opamp) ..... are they same? (5)
ADC in Matlab, really-really need your help! (1)
what does bulk really mean? (2)
does a negative resistance really generate power (4)
does chicken mesh antenna really exist ? (1)
Why for Charge Pump they do Phase Noise analysis?? (2)
Does AGC REALLY Necessary in GPS Front-end? (8)
how does IEEE 802.11i really work (1)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS