| Author |
Message |
narayanb
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Posts: 1
|
13 Sep 2009 16:45 Difference between simulation and measured results in ADS |
|
|
|
|
What are the chances that ADS simmulations does not match with the actual measured results?
Got this problem when i designed a meander antenna in layout and simulated using momentum. A very prominent resonance appears at 200 MHz, which is completely missing in the measured results...
The antenna operating frequency is 200-800 MHz, designed to resonate around 300 MHz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
13 Sep 2009 16:45 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamesanton
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 Posts: 22 Helped: 5
|
14 Sep 2009 9:04 Re: Difference between simulation and measured results in AD |
|
|
|
|
Hai,
The substrate dielectric constant may vary depends on manufacturer for a example if u take FR-4 substrate its dielectric constant may vary from 4.2 to 4.6 so the resonant frequency shifted to some other band.
The connector should be properly soldered.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skysearcher
Joined: 20 Jul 2009 Posts: 10
|
14 Sep 2009 16:09 Difference between simulation and measured results in ADS |
|
|
|
|
| Some - for a 2% microstrip filter I made, I had to fabricate several copies of the design at slightly different frequencies. Of course, I was also seeing an effect from lid height, too. It does seem odd for there to be a strong resonance, though - I agree with Jamesanton that improperly attached connectors can cause some weird problems.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |