electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

Impedance control on PCB


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Professional Hardware and Electronics Design -> Impedance control on PCB
Author Message
neutrino



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Italy


Post12 Feb 2009 23:04   

pcb impedance


Hi,
i have some questions:
1) what is the limit over is necessary consider a trace of PCB as trasmission line??
2) Usually length > lambda/10 is a usefull formula. Is correct?? For example, if i have to project PCB with RAM,FPGA...with 50-100MHz digital signal, is necessary control impedance??
3) What is a maximum length for route that nets in multilayer FR4 dielectric? About 2 inches length is critical for 70 MHz digital trasmission data?

Regards
Back to top
House_Cat



Joined: 21 Feb 2002
Posts: 1507
Helped: 307
Location: USA


Post13 Feb 2009 2:40   

impedance control


It isn't the frequency of the digital signal that matters on a PCB - it's the risetime (or fall time) of the edge because that's where the data is contained. The critical length is approximately where the roundtrip propagation delay on the trace equals the risetime. For FR4 with a typical Er that works out to about 3 inches for a one nanosecond risetime. Beyond that critical length, it is essential to use transmission line design considerations, including impedance matching and termination.

The maximum trace length can be approximated as Lmax <= Risetime/(safety factor - propagation time). The propagation time is dependent on the board materials, and the safety factor is just an arbitrary design margin that you, the designer chooses. It typically varies between 2 and 4 to account for external "noise" from power supplies, external EMI, etc. You can also use Lmax <= (c x Risetime)/(3.5sqrt(Er)) for a very rough maximum trace length estimate. As the ristime increases, that estimation gets less accurate because the shape of the trace begins to enter into consideration for the field behaviour around the trace.
Back to top
neutrino



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Italy


Post13 Feb 2009 11:38   

pcb impedance control


Thanks for this perfect answer House_cat

This is about trace length, but i think even for impedance matching. With my collegues, i discuss many times if use or not a impedance control, even when trace are short. Recently, i posted in this forum a trouble with radiated emission about multilayer PCB. Trace length are electrically short (rise time 2ns, trace length about 1.5 inches on FR4, 6 layers). PCB AC cable, measured with capacitive clamp, radiate very much (60dBpW @ 60MHz). I suppose is necessary impedance matching even if trace are electrically short...

Is correct?
Back to top
House_Cat



Joined: 21 Feb 2002
Posts: 1507
Helped: 307
Location: USA


Post13 Feb 2009 21:34   

pcb impedance matching


Yes, that's correct. If you want maximum energy transfer from the source to the sink, you want the impedance matched along the entire signal path. If you don't do that, you can expect reflections (signal distortion) and radiated energy. In the case you mention, you probably had an unterminated trace, or some other mismatch between source and sink impedance.
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post13 Feb 2009 21:34   

Ads




Back to top
FvM



Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 5154
Helped: 767
Location: Bochum, Germany


Post13 Feb 2009 22:57   

impedance vontrol


Although impedance matching is related to EMC in several regards, it's not generally sufficient to achieve low emission designs. There are many other aspects involved, particularly power supply decoupling and filtering, also ground and power plane current distribution.

A radiating supply cable should be mainly considered as case of conducted emissions, I think.
Back to top
pcbdesigner34



Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Posts: 21


Post14 Feb 2009 18:17   

impedance pcb


The return path of the high speed signal is important in case the trace length is very short. If the return path is not an undereground trace, for example a ground slot, then it can lead to several secondary issue incluing EMI.

If however, the return path is continuous, changes in impedance should have small effect in quality of signal for length lambda/10. It is however, better to keep the impedance defined - to simplify the design rules.

For PCB designers I recommend the book "Signal Integrity for PCB Designers" available at amazon for 35 bucks or so.
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Professional Hardware and Electronics Design -> Impedance control on PCB
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
PCB Impedance Control (3)
PCB control impedance calculation (5)
Article about PCB impedance Control (2)
Impedance control on the mass PCB production (3)
PCB Trace impedance (6)
PCB Impedance Calculation webpage (2)
Impedance Control Board (6)
Impedance constraints while manufacturing PCB (6)
Why do we use 50 Ohm impedance on PCB? (3)
Measure of natural PCB trace impedance (1)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS