| Author |
Message |
nl5
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Helped: 4
|
 12 Jan 2009 17:24 python circuit simulator |
|
|
|
|
A new (for public) simulator NL5 is available at http://nl5.sidelinesoft.com.
It's not a Spice-based, and performs better than Tina, LTSpice and other for many schematic types, particularly switching power supplies.
Free Demo is fully operational, with limited number of components.
Thanks,
Alexei Smirnov.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zlatkoMM
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 182
Helped: 5
Location: Croatia
|
17 Jan 2009 19:47 nl5 circuit simulator |
|
|
|
|
To complicated and is not that better like you say.
I use Pintar and must say that is on of the best simulutor around...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nl5
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Helped: 4
|
17 Jan 2009 20:21 nl5 simulator |
|
|
|
|
Too complicated comparing to Pintar? Of course, yes (in terms of features available, not how to use it). I'm comparing NL5 with "mid-range" simulators: Tina, PSim, LTSpice, etc. Not with Saber though.
If Pintar does all you need, that's good: it is your tool!
Thank you,
Alexei.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
AdSense
|
17 Jan 2009 20:21 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nl5
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Helped: 4
|
30 Jun 2009 5:28 circuit simulator |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
NL5 revision 1.2 has been released. It has many new components, models, and features available, including direct data exchange with external applications (MATLAB, PYTHON) through HTTP link, C-block with custom code written on C language or using DLL, customized components, and much more.
If 20 components allowed in demo version is not enough for your design, feel free to contact me and order a free trial license. Please be aware that students and educational institutions are eligible for free long term trial license.
Thank you,
Alexei.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nl5
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Helped: 4
|
26 Sep 2009 4:09 Re: NL5 Analog Circuit Simulator, now available |
|
|
|
|
FYI. Simulation time of some simulators compared to NL5 for quite simple circuits. "Failed" means wrong simulation results.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
