| Author |
Message |
pigyong801
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Helped: 4
|
 16 Dec 2008 1:38 icd3 clone |
|
|
|
|
pic1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pigyong801
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Helped: 4
|
16 Dec 2008 1:39 icd 3 |
|
|
|
|
ic2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigyong801
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Helped: 4
|
16 Dec 2008 1:40 Re: picture of icd3 |
|
|
|
|
| ic3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
AdSense
|
16 Dec 2008 1:40 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigyong801
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Helped: 4
|
16 Dec 2008 1:41 Re: picture of icd3 |
|
|
|
|
ic3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigyong801
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Helped: 4
|
16 Dec 2008 1:42 Re: picture of icd3 |
|
|
|
|
top
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hkian
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 1
|
16 Dec 2008 17:18 picture of icd3 |
|
|
|
|
| nice,can anybody reverse it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blueroomelectronics
Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Posts: 1681
Helped: 99
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
16 Dec 2008 18:56 picture of icd3 |
|
|
|
|
It's not really worth reversing unless you're a clone maker planning on making thousands. The TQFP parts would be no fun to solder and you still need to preprogram the parts. It would cost about as much as the ICD3 would from Microchip.
We have plenty of ICD2 & PICkit2 clone designs that can do pretty much anything most of us will ever need.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigyong801
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Helped: 4
|
17 Dec 2008 1:24 I think so |
|
|
|
|
| blueroomelectronics wrote: |
It's not really worth reversing unless you're a clone maker planning on making thousands. The TQFP parts would be no fun to solder and you still need to preprogram the parts. It would cost about as much as the ICD3 would from Microchip.
We have plenty of ICD2 & PICkit2 clone designs that can do pretty much anything most of us will ever need. |
Added after 1 minutes:
buttom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
funnynypd
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 918
Helped: 21
Location: USA & Canada
|
30 Dec 2008 21:25 picture of icd2 |
|
|
|
|
It is quite interesting, Microchip used a lot of third party chips on this design. It is basically a deny of its own USB design for high end.
For low end, low performance, and low price, Microchip USB microcontroller seems ok.
For a little bit high end and high performance design, even microchip use other suppliers' USB solution.
Same as the ICD2 design, the new ICD3 design also count on the auto-recover fuse technology for circuit protection.
New version of ICD2:
Old version of ICD2:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
master_slave
Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 51
Helped: 5
Location: Manila, PH
|
11 Sep 2009 7:50 picture of icd3 |
|
|
|
|
| Oh my, it has a Xilinx FPGA in it...will it be easy to reverse this? Looks hard.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
