| Author |
Message |
hqqh
Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 255 Helped: 8 Location: www
|
11 Oct 2008 16:51 bluetooth antenna in wikipedia |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
is it possible to use only one antenna for a WLAN / Bluetooth application if the antenna is multiplexed? Does someone know such a device? I thougth it can be implemented like this:
PCB antenna (2.4ghz) --> Multiplexer |--> Balloon 1 --> RF IC1
................................................. ...|--> Balloon 2 --> RF IC2
regards
hqqh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vfone
Joined: 10 Oct 2001 Posts: 2328 Helped: 327
|
11 Oct 2008 19:16 Re: One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
“A balloon is a flexible bag filled with a type of gas, such as helium, hydrogen, nitrous oxide or air”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balloon
Probably you want to say balun (BALanced to UNbalanced)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balun
I don’t think that a balun can help to switch one antenna to 2 transceivers, that works simultaneous on the same frequency.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hqqh
Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 255 Helped: 8 Location: www
|
11 Oct 2008 21:25 Re: One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
hi vfone,
thank you for the spelling check .
I thought two baluns are needed in the case that RF IC 1 and RF IC 2 have different input/output impedances. I don't want the balun to do this switching thing. for this task the multiplexer should be there.
For the application i have in mind, i just need to receive data in a short time frame using RF IC 1 and after this, i want to send data for a short time frame using RF IC 2. So the reason, why i want just one antenna is to save pcb area.
And i thought in mobile phones the antenna is used for gsm and gps together. So it seams to be a solution for this problem, isn't it?
Any ideas?
regards
hqqh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kohi_boy
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 133 Helped: 15
|
12 Oct 2008 2:00 One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
| How about a circulator since you dont need to transmit and receive at the same time ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vfone
Joined: 10 Oct 2001 Posts: 2328 Helped: 327
|
12 Oct 2008 11:11 Re: One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
GSM and GPS use different frequencies.
I don’t think you can use the antenna just for receiving WLAN and Bluetooth protocols. You have to transmit also, to maintain the link connection. And when you transmit you need an isolation between transceivers.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hqqh
Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 255 Helped: 8 Location: www
|
21 Oct 2008 20:51 Re: One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
ok, I found a device which seems to be suitable: Analog Devices - ADG936 RF switch. wideband 4GHz, high isolation between these two channels.
@vfone: as I said, only one rf transceiver is active at the same time. during this time the active transceiver can receive and transmit data. So I think it should work.
Regards
hqqh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyg
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 90
|
14 Nov 2008 10:27 One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
do you know any type of the antenna that suitable to design for bluetooth and wifi band frequency?
i want to design the antenna for bluetooth and wifi application. i need to find which type suitable. i already try to tuning monopole antenna but it is hard to get dual band(bluetooth and wifi)
regards,
kyg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vfone
Joined: 10 Oct 2001 Posts: 2328 Helped: 327
|
14 Nov 2008 14:49 Re: One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
| WLAN 802.11 b/g and Bluetooth use the same 2.4GHz ISM band, so should be no problem using the same antenna. Only WLAN 802.11a use 5.6GHz band.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
14 Nov 2008 14:49 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyg
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 90
|
06 Mar 2009 6:54 Re: One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
vfone,
may i know how much efficiency performance for the antenna that you get?
what type antenna that you used for your application?
rgds,
kyg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kspalla
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 848 Helped: 140
|
06 Mar 2009 7:30 One antenna for WLAN and Bluetooth |
|
|
|
|
hqqh, your solution should work as only one system is using antenna at any time.
There are number of solutions like this.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |