| Author |
Message |
abhi_k11
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 4
|
09 May 2008 14:16 functional coverage |
|
|
|
| how to do functional coverage using ncvhdl and system verilog. Does ncvhdl support system verilog constructs?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ljxpjpjljx
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 129 Helped: 2 Location: Shang Hai
|
10 May 2008 5:57 Re: functional coverage |
|
|
|
| for functional coverage,you should first cordinate with the design team to list the function point in the spec ,then the tool is easy to use! The most important is the define of the function point!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abhi_k11
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 4
|
11 May 2008 9:25 Re: functional coverage |
|
|
|
I have actually done functional coverage for verilog desing using system verilog. Ncverilog supports system verilog. The same thing I want to do for my vhdl design. I have gone through ncvhdl docs and found that system verilog constructs are not supported. Do I have to use mixed languages simulation for this purpose?
I just want to know how to proceed and do functional coverage for vhdl design using system verilog.
Please let me know.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aji_vlsi
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 593 Helped: 69 Location: Bangalore, India
|
24 May 2008 2:47 Re: functional coverage |
|
|
|
| abhi_k11 wrote: |
I have actually done functional coverage for verilog desing using system verilog. Ncverilog supports system verilog. The same thing I want to do for my vhdl design. I have gone through ncvhdl docs and found that system verilog constructs are not supported. Do I have to use mixed languages simulation for this purpose?
I just want to know how to proceed and do functional coverage for vhdl design using system verilog.
Please let me know. |
As such VHDL language doesn't support func cov and hence you need to use mixed language sim - SV has bind that can be bound to VHDL (in Questa & VCSMX - not sure of IUS).
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ljxpjpjljx
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 129 Helped: 2 Location: Shang Hai
|
24 May 2008 5:37 Re: functional coverage |
|
|
|
| also the system verilog support the functional covreage statement!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |