| Author |
Message |
emresert
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 14
|
03 May 2008 17:59 fdtd dipole |
|
|
|
|
sorry,
i cant run the program fd3d_4.1.c in the book "electromagnetic simulation using the fdtd "by dennis sullivan,
anybody can help me?
emrsrt(at)gmail.com
i would be greatful
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jithesh
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 91 Helped: 12 Location: India
|
04 May 2008 2:51 dipole in space |
|
|
|
|
Hi
I may be able to help you. I am not sure whether I have the code fd3d_4.1.c or not. Better you upload it or send it to me (jithesh.lrde(at)gmail.com).
Best Regards
Jithesh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jithesh
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 91 Helped: 12 Location: India
|
05 May 2008 3:58 3d fdtd |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I made some corrections in the code. Now it is working. mail me in case any further problems are there.
Best Regards
Jithesh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
red5000
Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 120 Helped: 32
|
11 Jan 2009 11:22 fd3d_4.1 |
|
|
|
|
| can you upload this program for the begginners like me and thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hamidrezakarami
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 61
|
03 Feb 2009 10:45 w.google.com |
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have written a 3D FDTD sample code by matlab based on Sulivan book.
ABC used for these codes is PML with 7 cells.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
borjijiji
Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Posts: 21
|
16 Apr 2009 15:08 k space fdtd |
|
|
|
|
| I have problem with FD3D_4.1.c too
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
16 Apr 2009 15:08 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uomo
Joined: 24 Jun 2009 Posts: 1
|
06 Jul 2009 8:59 3d fdtd |
|
|
|
|
| hamidrezakarami wrote: |
Hi
I have written a 3D FDTD sample code by matlab based on Sulivan book.
ABC used for these codes is PML with 7 cells. |
great work!
why don't use the following string:
| Quote: |
dx(1:Imax,2:Jmax,2:Kmax) = dx(1:Imax,2:Jmax,2:Kmax) + 0.5*(hz(1:Imax,2:Jmax,2:Kmax) - hz(1:Imax,1:Jmax-1,2:Kmax) - hy(1:Imax,2:Jmax,2:Kmax) + hy(1:Imax,2:Jmax,1:Kmax-1));
|
instead of:
| Quote: |
for k = 2:Kmax
for j = 2:Jmax
for i = 1:Imax
dx(i,j,k) = dx(i,j,k) + 0.5*(hz(i,j,k) - hz(i,j-1,k) - hy(i,j,k) + hy(i,j,k-1));
end
end
end |
it is faster!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |