| Author |
Message |
wateror
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 81
|
 18 Feb 2008 5:18 which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
| encounter?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
AdSense
|
18 Feb 2008 5:18 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deh_fuhrer
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 421
Helped: 28
|
18 Feb 2008 8:14 Re: which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
1. MAGMA......
2. ASTRO......
3. SOC ENCOUNTER.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
raju3295
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 131
Helped: 5
|
18 Feb 2008 10:44 which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
| nano route is the best for the routing ,but for placement i feel encounter wont do the best job
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
s_eldin00
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 1
|
18 Feb 2008 10:51 Re: which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
Astro for sure
Sherif
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bhav
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 81
Helped: 1
Location: India
|
18 Feb 2008 11:54 which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
MAGMA gives complete flow from RTL to GDS-II in one
But in my perspective it is not that powerful for optimization of large SoC Designs
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spauls
Joined: 17 Dec 2002
Posts: 547
Helped: 19
|
18 Feb 2008 14:14 Re: which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
| ICC is also a better option.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shiv_emf
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 641
Helped: 16
|
18 Feb 2008 19:06 which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
nano route is the BEST.
Guys instead of giving which is BEST>. give pros n cons.
I find nano to be efficient.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iwpia50s
Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 174
Helped: 16
|
20 Feb 2008 0:40 which is the best tools for place&route? |
|
|
|
|
| This is a very subjective question. Each tool has its strength and weakness...depending on the design topology and complexity.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
