| Author |
Message |
watertreader
Joined: 02 Dec 2005 Posts: 187 Helped: 6
|
06 Dec 2007 13:13 filter before amplify |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Would like to know which one is the common practice? which is better and is there a condition for one to be superior over the other?
I have a PMT(photomultiplier tube) which is currently connected to an amplifier before the amplified signal is then digitised for processing with the computer. I would like to include in a filter to clear up some interfering noise from both the electrical line and ambient source. Where should I place it? what other consideration do we need?
Thanks!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
halls
Joined: 12 Nov 2007 Posts: 107 Helped: 21 Location: Basque Country
|
06 Dec 2007 16:24 filter or amplify first? |
|
|
|
|
Always amplify BEFORE filtering.
When filtering you attenuate the signal, and when you amplify, you amplify both the signal and the noise.
If you put the filter before the amplifier you first filter your signal attenuating it. This means that the filtered signal level is very close to the noise level. When then amplifying it, you get both signal and noise amplified, thus having almost the same signal to noise ratio (SNR, which will be low) but with amplified levels.
In the other hand if you first amplify you will get both noise and signal amplified, BUT, then you filter the signal, thus eliminating most of the amplified noise, thus getting a much better SNR.
Hope it's clear
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
06 Dec 2007 16:24 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eugen_E
Joined: 29 Nov 2004 Posts: 358 Helped: 31
|
06 Dec 2007 17:50 filter before or after lna |
|
|
|
|
It depends on situation.
If the input signal has a limited amplitude range, and the amplifier is linear in that range, you should amplify and then filter the signal, so you don't attenuate the usefull signal and keep a high SNR.
But if the input signal it's very noisy and has random amplitude pertubations superimposed (like the signal from a receiver antenna) it won't have a well defined amplitude range and may overload the amplifier (if it's not linear at high levels). Working in the non linear range will destroy the usefull signal, so in this case it's useful to have a minimal filter at the input to attenuate the perturbations outside the interest bandwidth.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yeechyan
Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Posts: 111 Helped: 1
|
13 Dec 2007 2:58 filtering or amplifying first |
|
|
|
|
| If you are using switching amplifiers, you need filters at the output to filter out the carrier frequency.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laktronics
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 945 Helped: 156
|
13 Dec 2007 15:19 filter effects before amp |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
It is desirable to put the filter before the amplifier for the following reasons:
- Since the level of the input signal is low, the filter components need not handle large signals and therefore need be less power rated.
- The amplifier need not handle noise, which might otherwise have introduced distortions due to clipping of total input (signal + noise), thus improves the usable signal range of the amplifier.
- Assuming amplifier itself is not the source of noise ( like Chopper amplifiers), the SNR of the overall circuit will remain same irrespective of where the filter is introduced.
Regards,
Laktronics.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ehsanelahimirza
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 430 Helped: 33
|
13 Dec 2007 19:15 do i amplify then filter or filter then amplify? |
|
|
|
|
| filteration should b first otherwise amplification will amplify the noise level which will be more difficult to tackle as compared to filter before amplification
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Old Nick
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 Posts: 445 Helped: 49
|
13 Dec 2007 20:32 before filter & amplifier |
|
|
|
|
| ehsanelahimirza wrote: |
| filteration should b first otherwise amplification will amplify the noise level which will be more difficult to tackle as compared to filter before amplification |
Filters will add noise too though.
In any noise critical system which requires a gain stage, the highest gain part of the sytem should always be placed first (if possible), then subsequent noise additions will be a smaller compared to the signal.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Filtronetics
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 34
|
14 Dec 2007 0:25 filter noise or amplify first |
|
|
|
|
Maybe you can consider using two filters. One before the amplifer as preselect filter which normally has low insertion loss and wide bandwidth. Another one after the amplifier with more selectivity to get the signal you want.
The filter before amplifier needs to be with low insertion loss as the insertion loss will be added to the system noise figure directly.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gte582w
Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 96 Helped: 7
|
14 Dec 2007 20:54 amplify and filter or filter and then amplify |
|
|
|
|
| That's the similar question about whether we should put band selection filter before or after LNA in the wireless transceiver design.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |