electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

dual core CPUs and HFSS, CST


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Electromagnetic Design and Simulation -> dual core CPUs and HFSS, CST
Author Message
has_ajam



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 131
Helped: 3


Post07 Oct 2007 15:10   

cst cpu


Can HFSS and CST Support Dual cor CPUs?
Which Versions?
Back to top
si14



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 1061
Helped: 664
Location: North America


Post07 Oct 2007 21:57   

hfss mpi


If I get your question correctly, u mean does dual core cpu support the programs?
If so, the answer is affirmitive. u can use dual core cpu for the simulations.
Back to top
has_ajam



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 131
Helped: 3


Post08 Oct 2007 7:23   

hfss cpu ram


suppose a cpu is intel 3GHz and single core
another cpu is intel 1.5 GHz and dual core.
all other parts are similar
are they equivalent for HFSS and CST or not?
Back to top
Azulykit



Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 851
Helped: 103
Location: All over the Map.


Post08 Oct 2007 22:10   

hfss parallel processing option


make sure you have the correct HFSS license features.
Back to top
si14



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 1061
Helped: 664
Location: North America


Post12 Oct 2007 19:03   

cst cpu support


has_ajam wrote:
suppose a cpu is intel 3GHz and single core
another cpu is intel 1.5 GHz and dual core.
all other parts are similar
are they equivalent for HFSS and CST or not?


Hi, ajam.
I think it depends on differnet algorithms. For example if the algorithm deals with a lot of data at the same time, of course a dual core cpu (transfering data is doubled with parallel algorithms) is more effective. but if the processing speed is important, of course I suggest the 3GHz instead of 1.5 Ghz.
If you are going to buy, I can ask that for you.
Cheers.
Back to top
rfmw



Joined: 10 May 2001
Posts: 520
Helped: 38


Post14 Oct 2007 18:29   

hfss multi-thread


At the EU Microwave Conference last week in Munich I talked to the CST expert.

I asked him, what is the computational speed-up of the transient solver if I have 2 CPUs, each quad core, in comparisom with a single CPU, single core.

He said, something around x2.2. Not more. (he sounded like he knew what he was talking about, he wasn't a salesman)

Any comments?
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post14 Oct 2007 18:29   

Ads




Back to top
fantomf4



Joined: 01 Aug 2002
Posts: 125
Helped: 5


Post15 Oct 2007 1:33   

cst support intel


I do not know all the details, but you are probably better off with a dual core processor. Reason being your computer is always running some applications in the background, so extra core will enable it to dedicata a total power of one processor to HFSS.

Some programs can run on multiple cores, like HFSS, but you would need a special license.
Very Happy
Back to top
hamid2000



Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 25
Helped: 1
Location: Tehran


Post15 Oct 2007 21:42   

distributed solve hfss


Hi
I think dual core case is faster. Altough you candetermine number of parallel processsors in CST Transient Solver/specials/solver.
Back to top
abdoeng



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 685
Helped: 14
Location: EGYPT


Post16 Oct 2007 11:48   

hfss multicore sweep


i advice using AMD processor than INTEL in CST package that CST already compatable with AMD processor
Back to top
cd79



Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 67
Helped: 14
Location: Germany


Post17 Oct 2007 10:04   

cst license parallel


For HFSS:
Using two cores does not make double speed for the solution process.
I does make sense to set it up as a distributed solve. Then the frequency sweep is distributed to the cores, so that it needs half the time.

Anyway you need one solver license for each CPU core. If you have a double core CPU and only one license you can use only one core.
For the distributed solve you need a floating license. It was initially made for solving on several machines in parallel.
Back to top
plasma



Joined: 20 Dec 2001
Posts: 577
Helped: 40


Post21 Oct 2007 0:17   

cst 2009 on quad core


Hfss can run at list on 4 or 8 cpu if you have the right license.
CST from ver2008 can run per full CPU. so if you have one license. for one dual or quad core CPU it will use them all (2 or 4). and with license for 2CPU like two quad Xeon. It will use the all 8 cores.that what they promise for ver2008 next month delivery of it.
Back to top
nicola.lopez



Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 1


Post19 Dec 2008 11:50   

what is the correct way to say central time


Hi all.

In general beware: Threads are not jobs! they run on the same pc with shared memory --> you'll never get the double speed on multi-threaded jobs with multicore processors.

Having a dual-quad etc... core does not mean you divide per 2, 4 your simulation time, simply you charge by half/one forth your proc in the sense that other threads are allowed to be run on the same proc, but CST does not do this automatically. The real advantage you will have when you have more procs (evantually multi-core each), and there CST have a parallelaization license which create 2 (or more) threads to be launched each on a single proc.

As of 2009 version you have MPI,able to exploit cluster pc.

Bye
Back to top
ravi8331



Joined: 04 Jul 2008
Posts: 337
Helped: 95
Location: India


Post20 Dec 2008 13:16   

hfss license


yes
CST and HFSS both are run on dual core CPU .....i already use dual core processor and working on both software i.e. CST and HFSS.
Back to top
nasimakis



Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2


Post14 Apr 2009 13:16   

how to speed up hfss


i am confused. some say you should have a special license to exploit all cores in a pc, with HFSS programm, some say you should go to tools/options/hfss_options and just put the number of cores there. Does anyone know what is really the correct of the two?
I have an intel pentium core 2 quad pc and i tried with the second way to take advantadge of all 4 cores. The result on the real time of HFSS wasn't much different and in the task manager the cpu usage percentage didn't change. Do all these mean that i haven't activate all cores for HFSS simulations?

Thank you
Back to top
ajfarris



Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 1


Post06 Aug 2009 2:07   

cst threads


nasimakis wrote:
i am confused. some say you should have a special license to exploit all cores in a pc, with HFSS programm, some say you should go to tools/options/hfss_options and just put the number of cores there. Does anyone know what is really the correct of the two?
I have an intel pentium core 2 quad pc and i tried with the second way to take advantadge of all 4 cores. The result on the real time of HFSS wasn't much different and in the task manager the cpu usage percentage didn't change. Do all these mean that i haven't activate all cores for HFSS simulations?

Thank you

You must have a multiprocessor-enabled license to use more than a single core (i.e. one solver thread only no matter how many cores are available). Once you have the proper license, any number of cores (within a single physical machine, i.e. all processors connected to a single motherboard and running a single operating system) can be used by setting the correct number of solver threads to execute.

For your specific case, the correct setting is 4 solver threads, but you need the proper license before this setting has any effect.
Back to top
jongjong



Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 23
Helped: 3


Post06 Aug 2009 7:15   

cst dual core


i have try CST on CPU's single core 2.6Ghz 1G ram, core2Duo 1G ram, and core2quad 2G ram. i can only experience the difference when the processor is 100% used. Simulation time is less than 1/2 in core2quad compare to core2duo. but you cannot compare the time of simulation on both if they are not processing 100%. my experience
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Electromagnetic Design and Simulation -> dual core CPUs and HFSS, CST
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
Which is Better- A Dual Core or 2 Seperate CPUs (3)
A problem with HFSS 10 on a dual core computer, help! (3)
How will HFSS use a dual-core CPU to run simulations (21)
which is numero uno --core duo & dual core processor (3)
Redhat 7 and pentium D 830, dual core 64 bit (1)
Memory problem - FEKO and CST on core 2 quad 2.4, 2GB ram (3)
HFSS and CST (12)
Dual core NB/PC ? (1)
Differences and uses for XFDTD,HFSS, and CST (4)
dual core processors (3)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS