electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

dsp processor


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Digital Signal Processing -> dsp processor
Author Message
amiran2001



Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 423
Helped: 2
Location: USA


Post18 Jun 2007 19:25   

dsp processor


What kind of dsp processors are better for communication system implementation?
Back to top
kastantin



Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 63
Helped: 5


Post19 Jun 2007 9:44   

Re: dsp processor


I thing TMS320c54xx
because it is widely use in mobiles, not expense and low power consumption
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post19 Jun 2007 9:44   

Ads




Back to top
rajsrikanth



Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 132
Helped: 8
Location: Hyderabad


Post20 Jun 2007 10:05   

Re: dsp processor


TMS-320 c54xx are useful in this for u.
Back to top
cydi



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 169
Helped: 11


Post22 Jun 2007 8:52   

dsp processor


Some mobiles use ARMs 56 series dSP chips... really powerfull and low power are its USPs...
Back to top
ebook123456789



Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 50
Helped: 1


Post26 Jun 2007 10:59   

Re: dsp processor


it depends on your application area. if for telcom and network, c54xx is good and has lot sw support. for mobile, c55 should be good for enhanced power consumption. TI has OMAP platform. Oak and MOT dsp are also ok.
Back to top
swingbyte



Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 44
Helped: 4


Post26 Jun 2007 15:45   

Re: dsp processor


What is it you want to do? If you are building a stand alone system then look to the chips, But you can do a lot of work with a pc - winmodems do.
Back to top
dsp4us



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 49
Helped: 7


Post22 Jul 2007 6:00   

dsp processor


There is no such a thing as "better dsp processor". As have been said it depends on for what application you going to use that. TI's 54 mentioned before was very popular several years ago. It took off when Nokia started to use it for its cell phones (as a core). Now 54 model is obsolete - 55's replaced that. It has more features and consumes less power. For application which does not concern about power consumption: ADI BlackFin, Ti 64 or even Ti 67 (floating point processor - mainly for radars and big complex systems) have widely used.

Cheers
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Digital Signal Processing -> dsp processor
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
fixed point dsp processor and floating point dsp processor (2)
TI DSP processor (7)
dsp processor? (12)
Dsp Processor (1)
DSP Processor (6)
DSP Processor (4)
DSP Processor (9)
DSP Processor microarchitecture (1)
dsp processor coding (3)
32bit DSP processor (7)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS