| Author |
Message |
amiran2001
Joined: 15 Jan 2007 Posts: 423 Helped: 2 Location: USA
|
18 Jun 2007 19:25 dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
| What kind of dsp processors are better for communication system implementation?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kastantin
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 63 Helped: 5
|
19 Jun 2007 9:44 Re: dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
I thing TMS320c54xx
because it is widely use in mobiles, not expense and low power consumption
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
19 Jun 2007 9:44 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rajsrikanth
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 132 Helped: 8 Location: Hyderabad
|
20 Jun 2007 10:05 Re: dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
| TMS-320 c54xx are useful in this for u.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cydi
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 169 Helped: 11
|
22 Jun 2007 8:52 dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
| Some mobiles use ARMs 56 series dSP chips... really powerfull and low power are its USPs...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ebook123456789
Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 50 Helped: 1
|
26 Jun 2007 10:59 Re: dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
| it depends on your application area. if for telcom and network, c54xx is good and has lot sw support. for mobile, c55 should be good for enhanced power consumption. TI has OMAP platform. Oak and MOT dsp are also ok.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swingbyte
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 44 Helped: 4
|
26 Jun 2007 15:45 Re: dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
| What is it you want to do? If you are building a stand alone system then look to the chips, But you can do a lot of work with a pc - winmodems do.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dsp4us
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 49 Helped: 7
|
22 Jul 2007 6:00 dsp processor |
|
|
|
|
There is no such a thing as "better dsp processor". As have been said it depends on for what application you going to use that. TI's 54 mentioned before was very popular several years ago. It took off when Nokia started to use it for its cell phones (as a core). Now 54 model is obsolete - 55's replaced that. It has more features and consumes less power. For application which does not concern about power consumption: ADI BlackFin, Ti 64 or even Ti 67 (floating point processor - mainly for radars and big complex systems) have widely used.
Cheers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |