electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

Renesas DSP microcomputer vs TI DSP chip


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Embedded Systems and Real-Time OS -> Renesas DSP microcomputer vs TI DSP chip
Author Message
feiutm9898



Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 227
Helped: 4
Location: Singapore


Post11 Jan 2007 13:42   

renesas dsp


Renesas have dual core microcomputer (1 high speed CPU and 1 DSP) whereas TI DSP chip provide good DSP processing but no CPU.

What do you think suitable way for low cost design? If decide to use TI DSP chip may cause one more MCU. This is likely not a good way.

Can anyone comment on this?
Back to top
Nandulal



Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 98
Helped: 1


Post26 Jul 2007 14:19   

iva2+ -pandora


Are you looking from cost wise or performance wise?
Back to top
Tamasco



Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 168
Helped: 11


Post03 Dec 2007 16:54   

what is a dsp chip


The TI OMAP series are also dual core processors!!
# OMAP5910 - ARM9 + C55x DSP
# OMAP5912 - ARM9 + C55x DSP
#OMAP3430 - ARM Cortex A8 + ISP (Image Signal Processor) + PowerVR SGX 2D/3D
Graphics Accelerator + IVA2+ (Imaging and Video Accelerator)

#OMAP-DM270 - ARM7 + C54x DSP

#OMAP850 - ARM926EJ-S + GSM/GPRS digital baseband + stacked EDGE
co-processor
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post03 Dec 2007 16:54   

Ads




Back to top
mowgli



Joined: 05 Apr 2002
Posts: 142
Helped: 20


Post06 Dec 2007 21:12   

texas instruments dsp 54xx


You have also to consider that TI produces high performances devices, like the C6x series, capable of high speed (the C6455 runs up to 1.2 GHz clock frequency) which can perform simultaneously tasks normally reserved to GPP processors (control flow, device interface and so on) and DSP operations (MAC, FFT etc.).
Of course such devices are not the cheapest, but you should consider the total saving in the BOL (bill of material) you obtain by substituting several devices (GPP/MCU + low-end DSPs used as co-processors) with one device.
Obviously you always have to evaluate the target application before making such a choice: just think that changing the platform implies that you should do a porting of all your SW to another environment and in case of DSP this could mean rewriting almost all the optimized assembly routines obtained after months/years spent debugging!

Regards
Mowgli
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Embedded Systems and Real-Time OS -> Renesas DSP microcomputer vs TI DSP chip
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
Ver of DSP chip (4)
How to Define a DSP chip? (2)
Which is better for DSP issues: FPGA or DSP devices? (1)
analog scrambler implementation on dsp chip (3)
Reccomended DSP Chip for Audio (1)
DSP-DSP interfacing for data transfer any data rate (2)
fixed point dsp processor and floating point dsp processor (2)
DSP (2)
DSP VS MP (8)
DSP (11)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS