| Author |
Message |
7rots51
Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 1427 Helped: 14
|
23 Oct 2006 20:08 pll spurious |
|
|
|
|
Hello friends
I designed a PLL+VCO circuit at 160MHZ with LMX2316 and minicircuit VCOs and 25MHZ crystal osc as ref.
Output is stable (Fcom=20KHZ,loop filter BW = 1KHZ),but as shown below have spurs at output near 160MHz carrier.Please guide me to remove the spurs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rancohen_2000
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 129 Helped: 25
|
23 Oct 2006 21:09 lmx2316 |
|
|
|
|
hi 7rots51,
for good answer i need the schematics. if you can please show only the high side of the signal with span of 2 MHz?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
toonafishy
Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 461 Helped: 25 Location: Earth
|
23 Oct 2006 21:12 lmx2316 pll |
|
|
|
|
What is the delta frequency between the 160MHz and the spur?
Is your charge pump comparison frequency 20 kHz?
Are you using a switching power supply? Power supply noise will appear as a spur on the PLL.
Do you have the extra RC network on the output of the loop filter (R3/C3) or are using just the two caps/1resistor network (R1, C2/R2)?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
23 Oct 2006 21:12 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
biff44
Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Posts: 1834 Helped: 244 Location: New England, USA
|
23 Oct 2006 21:48 spurious ouput |
|
|
|
|
I am going to bet you are using a .714286 MHz phase detector frequency, and this is just that spur (R=35, N=224). Try:
1) Using lower divisor numbers (higher phase detector frequency), such as R=15 and N=96. This will give you a higher phase detector frequency of 1 2/3 MHz
2) Add an RC lowpass filter at the VCO tune port to filter out phase detector spikes at 1 2/3 MHz. I would put in a lowpass with a 3 dB corner at around 20 KHz, and see if you like it better. (Whenever you add an additional lowpass filter you compromise the phase margin of the control loop, so you want to keep the lpf corner frequency say 20X the loop bandwidth, which I assume you correctly state as 1 KHz).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
radiohead
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 412 Helped: 34 Location: Heart of Europe
|
23 Oct 2006 22:29 Re: PLL spurious ouput? |
|
|
|
|
| I agree, it is probably your detector frequency which is too low, or your loop filter does not remove the spurs enough. You can consider selecting a higher order loop or simulate the filtering performance at the phase detection frequency.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
7rots51
Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 1427 Helped: 14
|
25 Oct 2006 17:20 Re: PLL spurious ouput? |
|
|
|
|
By adding a 10uf tan cap to VCO supply (there was only 1u ,100n ) and changing channel spacing to 25khz and loop filter to 250Hz ,I got this spectrum,Is it ok?
the phase noise is -90dBc ,is it enough?
the sch of circuit is in pdf file(simulation with analog device PLL software)
bye
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khouly
Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 2479 Helped: 343 Location: EGYPT
|
25 Oct 2006 17:25 Re: PLL spurious ouput? |
|
|
|
|
hi , it is a good results the spurs are disappeared , and it is great
about the phase noise u should u know is it good or band from the specs u need to have
and also u forget to mention the offset u measure the phase noise for
khouly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
No one
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 352 Helped: 3
|
03 Nov 2009 9:31 Re: PLL spurious ouput? |
|
|
|
|
Hello 7rots51;
It's an old post, but I have an opinion. I think that your new narrow LPF bandwidth increases the settling time of PLL. Is it true?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |