Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method?

 
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Professional Hardware and Electronics Design
Author Message
fishyxl



Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 66
Helped: 2


Post12 Sep 2006 13:47   Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method?

Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method? I am in urgent need of it. Thank you
Back to top
multanova51



Joined: 03 Mar 2002
Posts: 72
Helped: 3
Location: Vatican


Post12 Sep 2006 21:28   Re: Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method?

Hi there,

It is quite ambituous to expect an answer on this question...
I have no clue what you are talking about. You need to give a bit more explanation on what you are looking for otherwise we are guessing what you want Neutral
Back to top
aNdreiBuuu



Joined: 30 Apr 2001
Posts: 400
Helped: 11


Post13 Sep 2006 7:53   Re: Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method?

You are reffering to 3m EMI measurment method?
//a
Back to top
sophianining



Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 8


Post13 Sep 2006 13:49   Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method?

Yes, I am referring to 3m EMI measurement method. Because i wonder why 3m was selected,not 1m or 2m. What are its advantages?
Back to top
multanova51



Joined: 03 Mar 2002
Posts: 72
Helped: 3
Location: Vatican


Post14 Sep 2006 10:56   Re: Can you provide me with some theory in 3m method?

Hi

Normally fieldstrength measurements should be done in the far-field because in the near-field the fieldstrengths are changing more rapidly and are less accurate.
100 MHz corresponds to a wavelength of only 3m.
Therefore measuring at 100 MHz and 3 m distance is at 1 wavelength which is still pretty close and will result in free space not to be considered 377 ohm but less.
Far field starts more from 1.5 ... 2 wavelengths.
For a few 100's MHz you can indeed consider the field to be more far-field.

Some FCC stds refer to a distance of 10meters which i even more in the far field for eg 100 MHz. The disadvantage is that of course you measure much less voltage at 10m then at 3m.

But if you want to check EMI or fieldstrengths at 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz you can measure at closer distances and therefore have more voltage on your recvr/analyser. One can also skip the more expensive preamps. In our lab I measure often at 1 meter for quick verifications although it is not standard and I then recalculate to 3 meters.

Hope this satisfies your question... you can also check the very basic std from IEC , I think is IEC106 on radiated emission measurements.

Kind regards
Mike
Back to top
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Professional Hardware and Electronics Design
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour


Abuse
Administrator
Moderators
topic RSS 
sitemap