| Author |
Message |
hyy95120
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 36
|
29 Jan 2006 23:15 System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
hi,
How can I import system verilog code in blastcreate?
using
import rtl xxx.v
report error message
On magma's web site, it said
"...Blast Create accepts RTL (Verilog, System Verilog or VHDL) or netlist input ..."
But I can't find any info from the online documents.
Please help!
Thanks!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kbulusu
Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 133 Helped: 7
|
31 Jan 2006 2:26 Re: System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
| only new versions/builds released in Jan support SV and also they can just parse..they wont infer any logic..also they are supporting only assertions as of now...hope this helps...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spauls
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 Posts: 547 Helped: 19
|
31 Jan 2006 6:34 Re: System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
| No you cant do for System verilog
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aji_vlsi
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 640 Helped: 72 Location: Bangalore, India
|
01 Feb 2006 15:17 Re: System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
| kbulusu wrote: |
| only new versions/builds released in Jan support SV and also they can just parse..they wont infer any logic..also they are supporting only assertions as of now...hope this helps... |
Hi,
Does Magma support assertions for Synthesis? What does it synthesize to? I know DC "ignores" them - so simply parsing doesn't mean it "supports" it.
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spauls
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 Posts: 547 Helped: 19
|
02 Feb 2006 7:30 Re: System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
Ajeetha ,
Magma also has some special switches for synthesis off for particular lines.
Assertions are very well defined under that sections.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google AdSense

|
02 Feb 2006 7:30 Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aji_vlsi
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 640 Helped: 72 Location: Bangalore, India
|
02 Feb 2006 9:55 Re: System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
| spauls wrote: |
Ajeetha ,
Magma also has some special switches for synthesis off for particular lines.
Assertions are very well defined under that sections. |
Hi,
So you are saying that if my assertions are inside "pragma"s (such as translate_on/off) - then Magma can handle it - that makes sense, in that case it simply doesn't even see that code.
Thanks
Ajeetha, CVC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kbulusu
Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 133 Helped: 7
|
03 Feb 2006 0:21 Re: System Verilog in Magma |
|
|
|
|
Ajeetha,
As I mentioned earlier..it doesnt synthesize to anything...EDA vendors normally add "support" in phases depending on the interests of customers...Right now, majority of the customers only use assertions and most of the designers and design managers whom I talk to are still reluctant to write synthesizable code in SV for variety of reasons...number one is most design houses want all their EDA vendors to be on the same level...since designers are using assertions for DV purposes ..it makes sense for EDA tool vendors atleast to have assertions support initially sothat they wont choke when it sees SV constructs...I hope this helps...ur book coauthored with Ben is good..
cheers kiran.
[quote="aji_vlsi"][quote="kbulusu"]only new versions/builds released in Jan support SV and also they can just parse..they wont infer any logic..also they are supporting only assertions as of now...hope this helps...[/quote]
Hi,
Does Magma support assertions for Synthesis? What does it synthesize to? I know DC "ignores" them - so simply parsing doesn't mean it "supports" it.
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com[/quote]
[size=9][color=#999999]Added after 1 minutes:[/color][/size]
yes magma can handle non propietary synopsys stuff...said that it can handle synopsys translate_off/on ...
[quote="aji_vlsi"][quote="spauls"]Ajeetha ,
Magma also has some special switches for synthesis off for particular lines.
Assertions are very well defined under that sections.[/quote]
Hi,
So you are saying that if my assertions are inside "pragma"s (such as translate_on/off) - then Magma can handle it - that makes sense, in that case it simply doesn't even see that code.
Thanks
Ajeetha, CVC[/quote]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |