electronics forum

Rules | Recent posts | topic RSS | Search | Register  | Log in

a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Analog Circuit Design -> a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m
Author Message
incol



Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 97


Post23 Mar 2005 11:32   

a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Vx=Vbe=0.65v,so Vin of opamp is 0.65v,then M1 will cuteoff for Vth=0.712v.Vbe can't be easily changed,how can i do?


Sorry, but you need login in to view this attachment

Back to top
ambreesh



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 369
Helped: 21


Post23 Mar 2005 11:41   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Increase the current in the BJT diode. this is only way you could increse the VBE.
Plot the BJT diode transfer characteristic. From that u can get the vale of current to be pumped to get desired Vbe.
Better is u could use PMOS input pair for the amplifier.
Much simpler
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google Adsense




Post23 Mar 2005 11:41   

Ads




Back to top
markty



Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Helped: 2


Post23 Mar 2005 11:49   

a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Wow. I think you may use a pch mosfet input stage op amp in your case.
Back to top
lunren



Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 74
Helped: 1


Post23 Mar 2005 11:53   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


If technology allows, you can use casecode bipolar transistor.
Back to top
mike_bihan



Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Posts: 259


Post23 Mar 2005 15:30   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


use complementary amplifier

Added after 8 minutes:

incol wrote:
Vx=Vbe=0.65v,so Vin of opamp is 0.65v,then M1 will cuteoff for Vth=0.712v.Vbe can't be easily changed,how can i do?



Looking at your schematic, it is pretty clear that the amp's input pair is using negative vt device. So the input common mode range is low.
Back to top
Vamsi Mocherla



Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Posts: 482
Helped: 62


Post24 Mar 2005 8:00   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Simplest way to implement it is to use a level shifter. Use two PMOS source follower configurations for the input. As long as the source followers are on, you will get a VTH increase in the voltage to your differential pairs. Bias them so that you have a desired voltage for the input differential pair.
Back to top
incol



Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 97


Post24 Mar 2005 12:51   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Vamsi Mocherla wrote:
Simplest way to implement it is to use a level shifter. Use two PMOS source follower configurations for the input. As long as the source followers are on, you will get a VTH increase in the voltage to your differential pairs. Bias them so that you have a desired voltage for the input differential pair.



could you please show a figure about it,i dont know clearly
thank u
Back to top
JPR



Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Helped: 16


Post24 Mar 2005 17:12   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


I would be careful with the use of a level shifter. Make sure that it does not introduce in-band noise for your reference. For best noise performance, keep the number of devices that can contribute noise low. The level shifter can be one of several options:
- Place matching devices between M1 and R1 and between M2 and Q2. Take the voltages for the amplifier inputs from the more positive connection. Device can be a resistor, a diode connected NMOS, PMOS or bipolar. Since the currents in each will be the same, they will provide the same voltage drop, and will increase the voltage input to the NMOS input pair on your opamp.
- Use a follower device before the input to the opamp.

Depending upon your supply voltage, p-channel inputs to the amplifier might be the best solution, since it will probably not add any new devices for noise contribution.

Bipolar inputs to your amplifier might work, but I am guessing that your process will not support it?
Back to top
incol



Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 97


Post26 Mar 2005 10:57   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


JPR wrote:
I would be careful with the use of a level shifter. Make sure that it does not introduce in-band noise for your reference. For best noise performance, keep the number of devices that can contribute noise low. The level shifter can be one of several options:
- Place matching devices between M1 and R1 and between M2 and Q2. Take the voltages for the amplifier inputs from the more positive connection. Device can be a resistor, a diode connected NMOS, PMOS or bipolar. Since the currents in each will be the same, they will provide the same voltage drop, and will increase the voltage input to the NMOS input pair on your opamp.
- Use a follower device before the input to the opamp.

Depending upon your supply voltage, p-channel inputs to the amplifier might be the best solution, since it will probably not add any new devices for noise contribution.

Bipolar inputs to your amplifier might work, but I am guessing that your process will not support it?





i do that,but not good,i think i can only use pmos input
Back to top
ambreesh



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 369
Helped: 21


Post28 Mar 2005 5:14   

Re: a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


Dear Incol,
It is not necessary to have the same design as the author. You could have the same architecture, i.e. using an amplifier. to keep the two node voltages same. But if your technology doesnot support low, Vt devices then why go for NMOS input pair. Also it is believed that PMOS has better noise performance compared to NMOS so take the advantage of that.
What is intresting in the complete discussion is various methods everyone has contributed to solve the issue and corresponding advantages and disadvantages of each.
Also Ka Nang Leung in his paper has suggested a PMOS input pair structure also this paper "A Sub-1-V 15-ppm/ C CMOS Bandgap Voltage Reference Without Requiring Low Threshold Voltage Device" I suppose is what u are reffering for your design.
Back to top
nuiscet



Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 54
Helped: 3


Post30 Sep 2005 1:33   

a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


I think that the best and the most simply way is adopting PMOS input pair for the amplifier.
Back to top
wanily1983



Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 104
Helped: 3


Post30 Sep 2005 8:40   

a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


who can tell me why i can't see the figure?
i only see a black pane at the fugure zone.
Back to top
zenisle



Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 131
Helped: 2


Post01 Oct 2005 16:02   

a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m


yes. I agree with you
Back to top
Arabic versionBulgarian versionCatalan versionCzech versionDanish versionGerman versionGreek versionEnglish versionSpanish versionFinnish versionFrench versionHindi versionCroatian versionIndonesian versionItalian versionHebrew versionJapanese versionKorean versionLithuanian versionLatvian versionDutch versionNorwegian versionPolish versionPortuguese versionRomanian versionRussian versionSlovak versionSlovenian versionSerbian versionSwedish versionTagalog versionUkrainian versionVietnamese versionChinese version
Post new topic  Reply to topic    EDAboard.com Forum Index -> Analog Circuit Design -> a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled m
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Similar topics:
a simple question about bandgap, but really troubled me (3)
A simple question about ring oscillator but trouble me (16)
Simple question about resonant tank but not easy answer (15)
A simple question but nearly make me crazy (6)
A simple but important question on white/colored noise (4)
a question about bandgap ref and non-bandgap ref (7)
Stupid but URGENT question about in-circuit emulator (NEC) (3)
a question about bandgap circuit (9)
A question about bandgap reference! (7)
Question about bandgap stability (13)


Abuse || Administrator || Moderators || Support us || sitemap
topic RSS